The 24mm World Cup Final

Canon 24mm f1.4 L v Nikon 17-35mm f2.8 v Olympus 24mm f2.8



Performance at f2.8 (Corners)

Here we have to factor in a little sunlight to accommodate a rapidly moving British winter sky: the Nikon is somewhat disadvantaged by poorer light, but I resisted the temptation to re-shoot as it became evident that it wasn't going to outperform either of its competitors' corners, whatever the light.

CanonFlare2a
Canon 24mm f1.4 L at f2.8 (corner) Nikon 17-35: 24mm/f2.8 (corner) Olympus 24mm f2.8 at f2.8 (corner)
1 points
0 points
2 points

Look beyond the low contrast rendition of the Olympus wide open, and there's a whole lot of captured information that – amazingly – neither lens can find.

What have we learned? Firstly – and for the first time in my testing – the Nikon zoom is being outplayed. At f2.8, the Canon 24L is very good when it's good, but question marks linger over its Ronaldo-like behaviour. The Olympus 24/2.8 again exceeds expectations: wide open, it really delivers, across the frame, and requires only modest post-production perking to restore contrast – even if it can't reach the dizzying heights of the Canon lens when it's on form.

 

 

16:9
Draw a straight line and follow it.

< Performance at f2.8: Part II   |  24mm Cup Final: f5.6 Test: Part I >
[ 1 ] [ 2 ] [ 3 ] [ 4 ] [ 5 ] [ 6 ] [ 7 ] [ 8 ] [ 9 ] [ 10 ] [ 11 ] [ 12 ] [ 13 ]
 
16:9 [ Image Library ] [ Lens Reviews ] [ StitchPix ] [ Hall of Fame ]
ceramic chandeliers contact us by email  (don't forget to remove the brackets) glass table
designer lighting rail supplies promotional gifts corporate incentives