Autofocus Converted Contax N Test: 17-35mm f2.8
Contax N 17-35mm f2.8 v Nikon AFS 17-35mm f2.8
Performance at 24mm: f11 (Centre Frame)
![dd](cz1735_24_f11_ce.jpg) |
![dd](nik1735_24_f11_ce.jpg) |
![Canon 24mm f1.4 L at f2.8](c24_f11_ce.jpg) |
Contax N 17-35mm at 24mm/f11 |
Nikon 17-35mm AFS at 24mm/f11 |
Canon 24mm f1.4 L / f11 |
0 points |
1 point |
2 points |
Performance at 24mm: f11 (10mm off-centre, right side)
![dd](cz1735_24_f11_mid.jpg) |
![dd](nik1735_24_f11_mid.jpg) |
![Canon 24mm f1.4 L at f11](c24_f11_mid.jpg) |
Contax N 17-35mm at 24mm/f11 |
Nikon 17-35mm AFS at 24mm/f11 |
Canon 24mm f1.4 L / f11 |
0 points |
1 point |
2 points |
Performance at 24mm: f11 (Upper left corner)
![dd](cz1735_24_f11_co.jpg) |
![dd](nik1735_24_f11_co.jpg) |
![Canon 24mm f1.4 L at f11](c24_f11_co.jpg) |
Contax N 17-35mm at 24mm/f11 |
Nikon 17-35mm AFS at 24mm/f11 |
Canon 24mm f1.4 L / f11 |
0 points |
1 point |
2 points |
Pretty much a repeat of the f8 results, here: Canon followed by Nikon followed by Zeiss. Given the way the results have flattened out, and based on the results obtained at 21mm, I shan't bore you with any more results at 24mm: suffice it to say that f16 reprises what we've already seen at f8 and f11.
Now we move on to 35mm . . .