17mm Comparisons: f2.8 (resolution)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ea413/ea413a129bdeefe2369f520295dcff41efc1bfa6" alt="" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4690f/4690fd805442c7b76634607188324e6001971994" alt="" |
Canon 16-35mm f2.8 (centre) |
Nikon 17-35mm f2.8 (centre) |
Commendable centre frame resolution from the Canon, less impressive from the Nikon. But before leaping to conclusions, here's a corner.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8dbca/8dbcaffc51c8e7dc0f48c2321de9c010c11b0b50" alt="" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/19764/1976440a6f1492d17a7759c731f84787a941a620" alt="" |
Canon 16-35mm f2.8 (corner) |
Nikon 17-35mm f2.8 (corner) |
The reversal of the centre-frame verdict is in line with the results of the Nikon 14mm test: both Nikon lenses are tricky to evaluate comparatively because the field of focus is far from flat: wide open, the Nikon is softer centre frame, but has superior contrast and corner resolution.