Nikon 14-24mm f2.8 G Test Series
Nikon 14-24mm f2.8 G v Contax Vario Sonnar 17-35mm f2.8 v Contax 21mm f2.8
> Please see here for the full range of 1DS III and 5D tests of the Nikon 14-24mm G
Very few zoom lenses behave consistently from end to end. Most are deliberately optimised for wide- or long-biased performance; some vary that way accidentally from sample to sample. It is probably more common for lens to be at its best in the shortest part of its range: the longer extremities tend to push the design to its limits, so we'll be looking very hard at the Nikon 14-24mm here at 21mm on the Canon 1Ds III.
Resolution & Drawing Style: Zone A (centre frame) at 21mm f2.8
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf388/cf3888c362d9a92cc89bbcfda1501568017f9792" alt="Zeiss 17-35mm f2.8 at 21mm" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6930b/6930bc3f78212960c2d0f4defbe7cc2b97e137b1" alt="Nikon 14-24mm at 21mm" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70bf8/70bf819fc08ed97d543b6d04f22c4cc355722074" alt="Zeiss 21mm Distagon at f2.8" |
Contax 17-35mm: Zone A at 21mm/f2.8 |
Nikon 14-24mm: Zone A at 21mm/f2.8 |
Contax 21mm f2.8: Zone A at f2.8 |
You'll note immediately the very cool (as in 'blue-ish') rendition of the Zeiss 21mm in comparison with the Contax N and Nikon lenses. In fact, the original file is so blue, I've added a warm-up filter in Photoshop to the Distagon's 100% crops. No other post-production was executed beyond USM. You may also notice that the Nikon suddenly doesn't look as sharp as it did at 17mm. Not true: it's just that the Zeiss 21mm is sharper and setting the two alongside each other is – for the first time! – unflattering to the Nikon.
Resolution & Drawing Style: Zone B (mid frame) at 21mm f2.8
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd484/bd484905273faa4912dc92fa9e791643f49ec272" alt="Zeiss 17-35mm f2.8 at 21mm" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10322/10322cffdbcf8a627d54dee3674be1f137dbe6ae" alt="Nikon 14-24mm at 21mm" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26304/2630422c7f27c96b57aa8526dd80ada12cf05a33" alt="Zeiss 21mm Distagon at f2.8" |
Contax 17-35mm: Zone A at 21mm/f2.8 |
Nikon 14-24mm: Zone A at 21mm/f2.8 |
Contax 21mm f2.8: Zone A at f2.8 |
However Zeiss-like the Nikon 14-24mm's rendition may be, it can't quite out-Herod Herod: the 21mm Distagon resolves a staggering amount of information wide open on the Canon 1Ds III.
Resolution & Drawing Style: Zone C (corner) at 21mm f2.8
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3b12/a3b12d6f17ae38fe03ec09008517aac181816149" alt="Zeiss 17-35mm f2.8 at 21mm" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4b4af/4b4afc85ac666e2b4cf478374b9dfada7213dfb0" alt="Nikon 14-24mm at 21mm" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bf344/bf3440aa4c50e90fe1e56d658eeb61ad569b2607" alt="Zeiss 21mm Distagon at f2.8" |
Contax 17-35mm: Zone A at 21mm/f2.8 |
Nikon 14-24mm: Zone A at 21mm/f2.8 |
Contax 21mm f2.8: Zone A at f2.8 |
But you have to admit that a corner this good at f2.8 is some achievement: the Nikon delivers consistently high resolution across the frame: not as sharp as the Zeiss in Zones A and B, but coming on strong in C. This crop reveals a slight difference in the positioning of the focal plane that puts a question mark over the Nikon's performance in this test: it was focused slightly more distantly than the Zeiss prime, which explains the relative poor resolution of the 'Controlled Zone' sign above.
Resolution & Drawing Style: Zone A (centre frame) at 21mm f5
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb383/eb383ee444c89a81ed8f4173651b7d0e6719f3d4" alt="Zeiss 17-35mm f2.8 at 21mm" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27f91/27f91f4b86e01b9bd81f55c5bd09c8634fe3d202" alt="Nikon 14-24mm at 21mm" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b3f4/1b3f456cc53d9e0841d3aa3f6ff3c29482ae40bf" alt="Zeiss 21mm Distagon at f2.8" |
Contax 17-35mm: Zone A at 21mm/f5 |
Nikon 14-24mm: Zone A at 21mm/f5 |
Contax 21mm f2.8: Zone A at f5 |
When you can't tell a Nikon zoom from a Zeiss prime, it must mean that both are outresolving the sensor in Zone A at f5. Pretty much flawless captures here from the 14-24mm and the 21mm, with the N zoom resolving well, but suffering from a Leica-like lack of contrast.
Resolution & Drawing Style: Zone B (mid frame) at 21mm f5
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/53d74/53d74937d4d8f7abbcb3e2fce32d23d4b6cd9283" alt="Zeiss 17-35mm f2.8 at 21mm" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40a5b/40a5b4b4be5fb210573bafbe9206e31bca356c93" alt="Nikon 14-24mm at 21mm" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/559b6/559b6b0475eefacd328976050e6affb96fda10fc" alt="Zeiss 21mm Distagon at f2.8" |
Contax 17-35mm: Zone A at 21mm/f5 |
Nikon 14-24mm: Zone A at 21mm/f5 |
Contax 21mm f2.8: Zone A at f5 |
Resolution & Drawing Style: Zone C (corner) at 21mm f5
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8ba8/a8ba8ea8031d50f8d5922bb41b48cc7a06fd1c74" alt="Zeiss 17-35mm f2.8 at 21mm" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8964c/8964cb55a57cf70e02e0322e1b608ecf6999f73e" alt="Nikon 14-24mm at 21mm" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5290b/5290b601a69af049b3fabd3b35a39c2baf708a26" alt="Zeiss 21mm Distagon at f2.8" |
Contax 17-35mm: Zone A at 21mm/f5 |
Nikon 14-24mm: Zone A at 21mm/f5 |
Contax 21mm f2.8: Zone A at f5 |
The Zeiss 21mm just owns this focal length. It remains to be seen whether Zeiss/Cosina can trump it with a ZF version in the future.
Resolution & Drawing Style: Zone A (centre frame) at 21mm f8
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5e9c6/5e9c647d71a623ece8ad03e11e4e85493b81c94b" alt="Zeiss 17-35mm f2.8 at 21mm" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67c9e/67c9e48c6daa9863a1e4787fb88c157ac0d470f6" alt="Nikon 14-24mm at 21mm" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe9f4/fe9f41535ffac002ece8a5f6031403e22e400be3" alt="Zeiss 21mm Distagon at f2.8" |
Contax 17-35mm: Zone A at 21mm/f8 |
Nikon 14-24mm: Zone A at 21mm/f8 |
Contax 21mm f2.8: Zone A at f8 |
Superb performances all round here, to be fair: as ever the Contax prime has just that bit extra to lift it above the competition – behold: it even stills foliage! – but at f8, you'd expect a half decent 21mm of any stripe to deliver a serviceable A Zone.
Resolution & Drawing Style: Zone B (mid frame) at 21mm f8
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07ef9/07ef941289dcf494162d0b7e67f87dcb92abb231" alt="Zeiss 17-35mm f2.8 at 21mm" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d265e/d265e0c2151637c50c13673104ab24f3602fd9a5" alt="Nikon 14-24mm at 21mm" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10531/105317f68a33c28158eed962c4f2bd671ad66f86" alt="Zeiss 21mm Distagon at f2.8" |
Contax 17-35mm: Zone A at 21mm/f8 |
Nikon 14-24mm: Zone A at 21mm/f8 |
Contax 21mm f2.8: Zone A at f8 |
Even the 22MP Mark III struggles to put much distance between these three: the Distagon has it by a whisker, followed by the Nikon and the Contax zoom in close third.
Resolution & Drawing Style: Zone C (corner) at 17mm f8
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/510cc/510ccf52de8e78da0c3058aeb35e8f658e4ae0d3" alt="Zeiss 17-35mm f2.8 at 21mm" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/89065/8906592a90a435e23778e66a24396c34bd63028b" alt="Nikon 14-24mm at 21mm" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79c1f/79c1f659f42c7de172964dd2c9572c593142e80f" alt="Zeiss 21mm Distagon at f2.8" |
Contax 17-35mm: Zone A at 21mm/f8 |
Nikon 14-24mm: Zone A at 21mm/f8 |
Contax 21mm f2.8: Zone A at f8 |
In conclusion, then: there's nothing to touch the Distagon 21mm. But only the 1Ds III makes the distinction this clear.
Return to 16:9 home page >